Zur Kategorisierbarkeit von Filmmonstern

2008 Januar 21

Zur Kategorisierbarkeit von Filmmonstern:

As for the beast itself, well, Hollywood creatures adhere to one of two models: the Ernest Borgnine (wide, toadish, grinning) or the James Woods (vulpine, pointy-faced, unfriendly), and our chum in “Cloverfield,” with his crutchlike arrangement of limbs, springs firmly from the latter camp. [Via]

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Diesen Kommentar-Feed via RSS abonnieren.